From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Matthias Hörmann <matthias(dot)hoermann(at)saltation(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #19042: Option --help not recognized at the end of command line in pg_restore |
Date: | 2025-09-03 19:09:00 |
Message-ID: | 365ACB7B-B731-4F66-B69B-1765194A5B58@yesql.se |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> On 3 Sep 2025, at 16:57, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Matthias =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B6rmann?= <matthias(dot)hoermann(at)saltation(dot)com> writes:
>> The 2025-09-03 13:45:15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> This is the intended behaviour, --help (and --version) is parsed specially and
>>> must be the first parameter. We do this for all command line utilities.
>
>> Well, the use-case that comes up quite often for me (for any commands,
>> not just postgres) is that I add parameters I know or remember from my
>> last look at --help and then want to check again what else to add, for
>> that it is useful to be able to use --help as the last parameter.
>
> FWIW, I agree with this.
Same here, it's a totally reasonable ask.
> I'd be in favor of recognizing
> --help (though probably not -?) in any argument position.
Any particular reason to restrict -? from this?
> Less sure about --version.
Agreed, I think --version should require being the sole parameter.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-09-03 19:22:30 | Re: BUG #19042: Option --help not recognized at the end of command line in pg_restore |
Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-09-03 17:06:02 | Re: BUG #18960: Mistake in test test_simple_pipeline (libpq_pipeline.c) |