Re: 2021-09 Commitfest

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
Date: 2021-10-01 17:49:24
Message-ID: 20211001174924.GC13090@ahch-to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 01:43:23PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 10/1/21 1:31 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 08:53:23AM -0500, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> >> Anyway we need to advance to a close, so I need help with:
> >>
> >> - what should we do with WoA patches? moving them to the Next CF?
> > Correcting myself, we cannot move WoA patches. So we should just close
> > them with RwF.
> >
> > Barring objections I will do that in the next couple of hours.
> >
> Isn't the usual procedure to change their status, move them, and then
> change it back again? ISTR something like that when I managed a CF.

Really?! That sounds tedious!
I will do that but we should improve that process.

Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SystemGuards - Consultores de PostgreSQL

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-10-01 18:05:36 Re: parallelizing the archiver
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-10-01 17:47:45 Re: Deduplicate code updating ControleFile's DBState.