Re: 2021-09 Commitfest

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
Date: 2021-10-01 18:15:53
Message-ID: 3547588.1633112153@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 01:43:23PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Isn't the usual procedure to change their status, move them, and then
>> change it back again? ISTR something like that when I managed a CF.

> Really?! That sounds tedious!
> I will do that but we should improve that process.

Indeed, that seems pretty silly.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Денис Смирнов 2021-10-01 18:24:15 Re: PoC Refactor AM analyse API
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-10-01 18:07:42 Re: PATH manipulation in 001_libpq_pipeline.pl fails on windows