Re: 2021-09 Commitfest

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
Date: 2021-10-01 18:29:08
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 1 Oct 2021, at 19:49, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 01:43:23PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>> Isn't the usual procedure to change their status, move them, and then
>> change it back again? ISTR something like that when I managed a CF.

Correct, if one looks at the activity log for an old entry the pattern of
moving to needs review, then to the next CF, then WoA is clearly visible.

> Really?!

Sadly yes.

> That sounds tedious!


> I will do that but we should improve that process.

Correct again.

Daniel Gustafsson

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2021-10-01 19:07:49 Re: parallelizing the archiver
Previous Message Денис Смирнов 2021-10-01 18:24:15 Re: PoC Refactor AM analyse API