Re: pg_receivewal documentation

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_receivewal documentation
Date: 2019-07-17 08:04:24
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 07:40:48AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> I understand the concern, I'm just worried that too much accuracy may
> render the sentence hard to read.
> How about adding "or priority-based" after "quorum-based"?

I would be fine with that for the first part. I am not sure of what a
good formulation would be for the second part of the sentence. Now it
only refers to quorum, but with priority sets that does not apply.
And I am not sure what "won't count towards the quorum" actually

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Iwata, Aya 2019-07-17 08:12:50 RE: libpq debug log
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-07-17 07:59:02 Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb