| From: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_receivewal documentation |
| Date: | 2019-07-17 17:59:55 |
| Message-ID: | 7eaf748c-3f40-c994-0eb3-7d87709588d0@redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 7/17/19 4:04 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> How about adding "or priority-based" after "quorum-based"?
>
> I would be fine with that for the first part. I am not sure of what a
> good formulation would be for the second part of the sentence. Now it
> only refers to quorum, but with priority sets that does not apply.
> And I am not sure what "won't count towards the quorum" actually
> means.
Maybe something like the attached ? Although it doesn't help we need to
include <literal>on</literal> as well...
Best regards,
Jesper
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v6_pgreceivewal-doc.patch | text/x-patch | 1.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2019-07-17 18:14:28 | Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-07-17 17:56:27 | Re: Change ereport level for QueuePartitionConstraintValidation |