Re: Table AM callbacks referring to heap in declarations (+typos)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Table AM callbacks referring to heap in declarations (+typos)
Date: 2019-06-01 19:37:43
Message-ID: 20190601193743.GF1905@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 12:22:10PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2019-06-01 15:09:46 -0400, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> While going through the table AM callbacks, I have bumped into a
>> couple of references to heap. I think that we should make that more
>> generic by using the term "table" as done when opening relations and
>> such. Attached is a cleanup patch.
>
> I'm unbothered by this, but I'm also not opposed to changing this. It's
> largely just keeping the previous code / comment.
>
>> While on it, I found a set of typos which looked like a copy-pasto
>> which got spread => "index_nfo".
>
> Yea, we should fix this.

Thanks. Do you mind if I fix both then?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-06-01 19:41:29 Re: psql completion bugs with access methods
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-06-01 19:35:35 Re: Doc fix on information_schema.views