Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date: 2018-12-14 00:23:39
Message-ID: 20181214002339.GD2921@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 07:14:57PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Based on at least a quick looking around, the actual grammar rule seems
> to match my recollection[1], adverbs should typically go AFTER the
> verb + object, and the adverb shouldn't ever be placed between the verb
> and the object.

This part has been a long debate already in 2012-2013 when I sent the
first iterations of the patch, and my memories on the matter are that
the grammar you are showing here matches with the past agreement.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-12-14 00:25:52 Re: Can we remove the #fdef UNUSED code from nbtxlog.c
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-12-14 00:15:12 Re: Change pgarch_readyXlog() to return .history files first