| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
| Date: | 2018-12-14 07:56:20 |
| Message-ID: | 0f23879f-6c28-b0d4-0c9d-dc9d26228353@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 14/12/2018 01:23, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 07:14:57PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> Based on at least a quick looking around, the actual grammar rule seems
>> to match my recollection[1], adverbs should typically go AFTER the
>> verb + object, and the adverb shouldn't ever be placed between the verb
>> and the object.
>
> This part has been a long debate already in 2012-2013 when I sent the
> first iterations of the patch, and my memories on the matter are that
> the grammar you are showing here matches with the past agreement.
Do you happen to have a link for that? I didn't find anything.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2018-12-14 07:57:17 | Re: Ryu floating point output patch |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-12-14 07:55:52 | Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |