Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
Date: 2018-09-25 02:50:47
Message-ID: 20180925025047.GG1354@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:39:40PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wonder why ClientConnectionLost isn't PGDLLIMPORT like the rest.

Same question here. As that's kind of a separate discussion, I left it
out. Now I don't mind changing that at the same time as that's
harmless, and as that's only a patch for HEAD. PGDLLIMPORT changes
don't get back-patched as well...
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-09-25 03:01:17 Re: Missing const in DSA.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-09-25 02:39:40 Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring