Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
Date: 2018-09-25 04:27:35
Message-ID: 20180925042735.h6xsbxmszecs26ez@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-09-25 11:50:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> PGDLLIMPORT changes don't get back-patched as well...

We've been more aggressive with that lately, and I think that's good. It
just is a unnecessarily portability barrier for extension to be
judicious in applying that.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-09-25 04:43:46 Re: when set track_commit_timestamp on, database system abort startup
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2018-09-25 04:16:27 Re: Add RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS and FROM FIRST/LAST options