Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
Date: 2018-09-25 02:39:40
Message-ID: 15533.1537843180@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> Let's change it then. ClientConnectionLost needs also to be changed as
> miscadmin.h tells that it could be used in a signal handler. What do you
> think about the attached?

Looks reasonable to me (I've not tested though).

I wonder why ClientConnectionLost isn't PGDLLIMPORT like the rest.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-09-25 02:50:47 Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-09-25 02:26:12 Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring