Re: pg_dumping extensions having sequences with 9.6beta3

Michael,

* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> > [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.]
> >
> > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Stephen,
> > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> > item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> > 9.6 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> > open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this
> > message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
> > discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> > well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1. Consequently, I will appreciate your
> > efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
> >
> > [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com
>
> I am not sure what's Stephen's status on this item, but I am planning
> to look at it within the next 24 hours.

That'd be great. It's definitely on my list of things to look into, but
I'm extremely busy this week. I hope to look into it on Friday, would
be great to see what you find.

Thanks!

Stephen