| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: to_date_valid() |
| Date: | 2016-07-26 23:38:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20160726233839.GD27321@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 07:41:15AM -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Surely these beta testers would test against the RC before putting it into
> production so I don't see an issue. I tend to agree generally but the point of
> beta is to find bugs and solicit suggestions for improvement to features.
> Having found a bug it doesn't make sense to avoid patching our current unstable
> release. This applies moreso because of our annual release cycle. On the
> topic of whether this becomes an exception to the rule I'm largely ambivalent.
We don't assume users re-test everything when the RC1 arrives --- we
assume the testing is cumulative from when we started beta.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2016-07-26 23:46:25 | Re: Proposal: revert behavior of IS NULL on row types |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-07-26 23:07:02 | Re: pg_dumping extensions having sequences with 9.6beta3 |