Re: Uber migrated from Postgres to MySQL

From: Rakesh Kumar <rakeshkumar464a3(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Dorian Hoxha <dorian(dot)hoxha(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guyren Howe <guyren(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Uber migrated from Postgres to MySQL
Date: 2016-07-26 22:10:40
Message-ID: 32D59C19-20BE-449F-9ED1-83A88F614786@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

--
Sent from mobile.

On Jul 26, 2016, at 5:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> On 07/26/2016 02:49 PM, Rakesh Kumar wrote:
> This is an old news. They are using mysql as a nosql to store schemaless. Basically one giant blob col. And thats where the role of mysql ends. The bulk of the processing will be in nosql.

That doesn't mean they didn't bring up some very good points.

JD

Yes of course. But this is not one of those "product A sucked and we moved to product B and same workload and work is now 10 times better. "

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-07-26 23:07:02 Re: pg_dumping extensions having sequences with 9.6beta3
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-07-26 21:56:42 Re: Uber migrated from Postgres to MySQL