Re: pg_dumping extensions having sequences with 9.6beta3

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Philippe BEAUDOIN <phb(dot)emaj(at)free(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dumping extensions having sequences with 9.6beta3
Date: 2016-07-26 09:08:56
Message-ID: CAB7nPqT2iUGdW-DDwguicn8u3k4=VjjaH4UJQRchoHbfE6+B8A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.]
>
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Stephen,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> 9.6 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this
> message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1. Consequently, I will appreciate your
> efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
>
> [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com

I am not sure what's Stephen's status on this item, but I am planning
to look at it within the next 24 hours.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerome Wagner 2016-07-26 09:20:35 question on parsing postgres sql queries
Previous Message Noah Misch 2016-07-26 07:50:37 Re: pg_dumping extensions having sequences with 9.6beta3

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2016-07-26 11:37:16 Re: Design for In-Core Logical Replication
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2016-07-26 08:54:54 Re: No longer possible to query catalogs for index capabilities?