Re: (A) native Windows port

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: (A) native Windows port
Date: 2002-07-10 14:15:44
Message-ID: 200207101015.44286.lamar.owen@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

[cc: trimmed]

On Wednesday 10 July 2002 03:42 am, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Lamar Owen wrote:
> > As a note of interest, RPM itself is backed by a database, db3. Prior to
> > version 4.x, it was backed by db1. Upgrading between the versions of RPM
> > is simply -- installing db3 and dependenies, upgrade RPM, and run 'rpm
> > --rebuilddb' -- which works most of the time, but there are pathological
> > cases.....

> > You now are running db3 instead of db1, if you didn't get bit by a
> > pathological case. :-)

> And how big/complex is the db1/3 system catalog we're talking
> about exactly?

Well, on a fully installed system it's about 44MB. The RPM database isn't
terribly complicated, but it's not trivial, either.

However, unless I am mistaken the generic db3 situation is easy migration.

>How many rewrite rules have to be converted into
> the new parsetree format during an RPM upgrade?

Don't know if anything comparable exists.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2002-07-10 14:20:52 Re: (A) native Windows port
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-07-10 14:12:56 Re: Date/time precision in 7.2

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2002-07-10 14:16:46 Re: [pgaccess-users] RE: [HACKERS] bugzilla.pgaccess.org
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2002-07-10 14:12:11 Re: (A) native Windows port