Re: 8.4 open items list

From: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.4 open items list
Date: 2009-03-27 07:07:43
Message-ID: 1d4e0c10903270007x1a74feb6m2bb447a0d9aa9fce@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Perhaps so, but again, it's not a new regression, so why should it be
> considered a blocker for 8.4beta?

I agree they shouldn't. You were talking about bumping them to 8.5
which is a totally different thing.

--
Guillaume

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Smet 2009-03-27 07:21:35 Re: New trigger option of pg_standby
Previous Message Tatsuhito Kasahara 2009-03-27 06:44:51 Re: display previous query string of idle-in-transaction