Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused]

From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brook Milligan <brook(at)biology(dot)nmsu(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused]
Date: 1999-09-20 22:06:29
Message-ID: 199909202206.SAA16351@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > I guess. The new pgaccess release was so different than the current
> > one, I just cvs removed all files, and readded everything. That is how
> > Makefile go lost.
>
> Ewwww...so, like, we lost the 'history' of the files that only changed vs
> were new? *raised eyebrow*

Yes, thought the pgaccess file was kept I think. I just checked, and
somehow the pgaccess files are not in the stable tree anymore, just the
directories.

I got the final version <24 hours from release. It was in my tree, but
now it isn't, and it isn't in 6.5.2 either.

I asked for the author to verify my work. I am adding it to the tree
now. What do we do?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 1999-09-20 22:18:15 Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 1999-09-20 21:50:19 create table and default 'now' problem ?