Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Theo Kramer <theo(at)flame(dot)co(dot)za>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Date: 1999-09-20 22:18:15
Message-ID: XFMail.990920181815.vev@michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers


On 20-Sep-99 The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
>> I have been thinking, the destroy should be drop, in keeping with SQL.
>> destroy was a QUEL'ism.
>
> {create,destroy}{user,db} should be drop'd, personally...admins should use
> the SQL commands directly...

I think it'd be better if they were kept. They're really convenient for
the newbie (I just introduced someone to PostgreSQL and all the way thru
were references to MySQL, including the create user, db, etc. scripts).

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-09-20 22:26:29 Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-09-20 21:36:32 Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-09-20 22:26:29 Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-09-20 22:06:29 Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused]