Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused]

On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > > I guess. The new pgaccess release was so different than the current
> > > one, I just cvs removed all files, and readded everything. That is how
> > > Makefile go lost.
> >
> > Ewwww...so, like, we lost the 'history' of the files that only changed vs
> > were new? *raised eyebrow*
>
> Yes, thought the pgaccess file was kept I think. I just checked, and
> somehow the pgaccess files are not in the stable tree anymore, just the
> directories.
>
> I got the final version <24 hours from release. It was in my tree, but
> now it isn't, and it isn't in 6.5.2 either.
>
> I asked for the author to verify my work. I am adding it to the tree
> now. What do we do?

Okay, am very confused here...just did:

cvs checkout -rREL6_5_PATCHES -P pgsql/src/bin/pgaccess

it extracted 243 files...

> cvs status Makefile
===================================================================
File: Makefile Status: Up-to-date

Working revision: 1.1.4.2
Repository revision: 1.1.4.2 /usr/local/cvsroot/pgsql/src/bin/pgaccess/Makefile,v
Sticky Tag: REL6_5_PATCHES (branch: 1.1.4)
Sticky Date: (none)
Sticky Options: (none)

I just performed the same on the same on the non-'-r' tree, and now see
what you mean :(

I should be able to fix this momentarily...I hope...

Its all a learning less...assuming you know what you've learnt? :)

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org