Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess seems a tad confused]

On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > >> More importantly, though, any bugs in the Makefile or
> > >> whatever will be noticed early by developers and won't wait until the
> > >> last moment. Since the basic installation scheme likely doesn't
> > >> depend much on the exact pgaccess release, there really isn't much to
> > >> be lost by keeping it in the development tree.
> >
> > > It is in the development tree, just not the most recent version.
> >
> > But the point is, if the most recent version had been in the development
> > tree, we'd have had a better shot at noticing that its makefile was
> > missing...
> >
>
> I guess. The new pgaccess release was so different than the current
> one, I just cvs removed all files, and readded everything. That is how
> Makefile go lost.

Ewwww...so, like, we lost the 'history' of the files that only changed vs
were new? *raised eyebrow*

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org