Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray
Date: 2019-03-05 14:35:14
Message-ID: 17899.1551796514@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> writes:
> This thread has been very quiet for a month. I agree with Andres [1]
> that we should push this to PG13.

I think the main thing it's blocked on is disagreement on what the
type name should be, which is kind of a silly thing to get blocked on,
but nonetheless it's important ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-03-05 14:37:55 Re: NOT IN subquery optimization
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-03-05 14:33:08 Re: Rare SSL failures on eelpout