Re: Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray
Date: 2019-03-05 13:38:22
Message-ID: 222e2fcc-a123-4196-e400-66f7fa2ff642@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/4/19 4:21 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:08:03PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> maybe "supertype". It is one char shorter .. somewhere is term
>> "supperclass, ..."
>>
>> In Czech language this term is short, "nadtyp", but probably it is not
>> acceptable :)
>
> Moved to next CF.

This thread has been very quiet for a month. I agree with Andres [1]
that we should push this to PG13.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/raw/20190214203752.t4hl574k6jlu4t25%40alap3.anarazel.de

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl O. Pinc 2019-03-05 13:46:36 Re: Patch to document base64 encoding
Previous Message David Steele 2019-03-05 13:28:33 Re: RE: libpq debug log