| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray |
| Date: | 2019-03-05 17:37:06 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCeq-2n9fgjQu+BhfDq2owZhUdDQMKfEkRJkG0i=1NfGQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
út 5. 3. 2019 v 15:35 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
> David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> writes:
> > This thread has been very quiet for a month. I agree with Andres [1]
> > that we should push this to PG13.
>
> I think the main thing it's blocked on is disagreement on what the
> type name should be, which is kind of a silly thing to get blocked on,
> but nonetheless it's important ...
>
I sent some others possible names, but probably this mail was forgotten
What about "ctype" like shortcut for common type? carraytype, cnonarraytype?
Regards
Pavel
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Verite | 2019-03-05 17:48:59 | Re: insensitive collations |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2019-03-05 17:22:12 | Re: Re: Optimze usage of immutable functions as relation |