Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Shaun Thomas <shaun(dot)thomas(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Date: 2020-04-07 02:19:41
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Fair enough. Unsure if Tomas is still online to comment and/or push,
> but reverting SORT_TYPE_STILL_IN_PROGRESS back to 0 works for me as an
> initial fix.

I'm guessing he went to bed, so I'll push a fix in a moment.
The patch has survived enough test cycles here now to make me
moderately confident that it fixes the issue.

regards, tom lane

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anna Akenteva 2020-04-07 02:25:53 Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-04-07 02:12:49 Re: WAL usage calculation patch