Re: list partition constraint shape

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: list partition constraint shape
Date: 2018-01-29 00:50:50
Message-ID: 02b77781-47a3-2c15-12c4-de3f69e99fbe@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujita-san,

On 2018/01/26 21:31, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2018/01/26 10:15), Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2018/01/25 21:17, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>> Some minor comments:
>>>
>>> +                   /*
>>> +                    * Construct an ArrayExpr for the non-null partition
>>> +                    * values
>>> +                    */
>>> +                   arrexpr = makeNode(ArrayExpr);
>>> +                   arrexpr->array_typeid =
>>> +                                   !type_is_array(key->parttypid[0])
>>> +                                       ?
>>> get_array_type(key->parttypid[0])
>>> +                                       : key->parttypid[0];
>>>
>>> We test the type_is_array() above in this bit, so I don't think we need to
>>> test that again here.
>>
>> Ah, you're right.  Fixed.
>
> Thanks.  I think the updated version is fine, but I think we can simplify
> the change in this part a bit further, so I modified your patch.  I also
> adjusted some comments in that change a little bit. Attached is a modified
> version of the patch.  What do you think about that?  Please let me know. 
> If that is okay, I'll mark this as Ready for Committer.

That looks good, thanks.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2018-01-29 01:08:51 Re: [Sender Address Forgery]Re: pg_(total_)relation_size and partitioned tables
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2018-01-29 00:16:29 Re: Built-in connection pooling