| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ivan Novick <inovick(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Built-in connection pooling |
| Date: | 2018-01-29 00:16:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20180129001629.GE5022@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 03:11:25PM -0800, Ivan Novick wrote:
> > The simplest thing sounds like a GUC that will automitcally end a connection
>
> > idle for X seconds.
>
> Uh, we already have idle_in_transaction_session_timeout so we would just
> need a simpler version.
>
>
> Oh i see its in 9.6, AWESOME!
In summary, the good news is that adding an idle-session-timeout GUC, a
max_connections limit hit cancels idle connections GUC, and a GUC for
idle connections to reduce their resource usage shouldn't be too hard to
implement and will provide useful benefits.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-01-29 00:50:50 | Re: list partition constraint shape |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-01-28 23:53:10 | Re: [PERFORM] performance drop after upgrade (9.6 > 10) |