Re: Re: Support plpgsql multi-range in conditional control

From: songjinzhou <2903807914(at)qq(dot)com>
To: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Support plpgsql multi-range in conditional control
Date: 2023-01-25 14:18:17
Message-ID: tencent_7640F3CAEE262DD822795D342C248082C109@qq.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello, this usage scenario is from Oracle's PL/SQL language (I have been doing the function development of PL/SQL language for some time). I think this patch is very practical and will expand our for loop scenario. In short, I look forward to your reply.

Happy Chinese New Year!

songjinzhou(2903807914(at)qq(dot)com)

Maybe you didn't understand my reply. Without some significant real use case, I am strongly against the proposed feature and merging your patch to upstream. I don't see any reason to enhance language with this feature.

Regards

Pavel

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2023-01-25 14:21:26 Re: Re: Support plpgsql multi-range in conditional control
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2023-01-25 13:59:44 More pgindent tweaks