| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | songjinzhou <2903807914(at)qq(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Support plpgsql multi-range in conditional control |
| Date: | 2023-01-25 14:21:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDObfrQsgwtD=U+nnUZXwTwykztCRrVBXrrONa8C2kfcA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
st 25. 1. 2023 v 15:18 odesílatel songjinzhou <2903807914(at)qq(dot)com> napsal:
> Hello, this usage scenario is from Oracle's PL/SQL language (I have been
> doing the function development of PL/SQL language for some time). I think
> this patch is very practical and will expand our for loop scenario. In
> short, I look forward to your
>
I don't see any real usage. PL/SQL doesn't support proposed syntax.
Regards
Pavel
> reply.
>
> Happy Chinese New Year!
>
> ------------------------------
> songjinzhou(2903807914(at)qq(dot)com)
>
>
> Maybe you didn't understand my reply. Without some significant real use
> case, I am strongly against the proposed feature and merging your patch to
> upstream. I don't see any reason to enhance language with this feature.
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu) | 2023-01-25 14:23:51 | RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions) |
| Previous Message | songjinzhou | 2023-01-25 14:18:17 | Re: Re: Support plpgsql multi-range in conditional control |