>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas G Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
Thomas> That's good news, but I'm annoyed I haven't been able to get this
Thomas> result myself yet. Did you use the redhat beta rpm for postgres, or
Thomas> did you do a clean install from sources?
clean install from source, that's why I listed the compiler versions and
flags. Isn't that what you've been trying to get it to work?
>> That was with gcc-188.8.131.52, (-O3 -m486), _however_, when compiled with
>> gcc-2.8.0 (-O3 -mpentium), all that nasty time stuff just crept back again,
>> don't know why.
>> BTW, something I'm a bit concerned about -- re: the ``~30 sec deficit'' in
>> regression test timing results you mentioned a couple of days ago -- I'm
Thomas> I ended up convincing myself that most of the time difference was the
Thomas> overhead in compiling with USE_LOCALE turned on. The RH rpm is
Thomas> compiled with it on, and most of my testing is done with it turned
I thought about doing some more testing and possibly tracking it down, and see
whether that was caused by some bugfixes somewhere, but without all the
snapshots from perhaps Feb-20 all the way up to the official release, it's a
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Zeugswetter Andreas SARZ||Date: 1998-03-04 08:24:25|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] doc troubles with tar.gz|
|Previous:||From: Brett McCormick||Date: 1998-03-04 07:07:34|
|Subject: version control backups?|