Re: Configurable location for extension .control files

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oliver Charles <ollie(at)ocharles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Configurable location for extension .control files
Date: 2013-06-10 14:51:33
Message-ID: m2hah69fyi.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> In any case, no packager is going to ship an insecure-by-default
>> configuration, which is what Dimitri seems to be fantasizing would
>> happen. It would have to be local option to relax the permissions
>> on the directory, no matter where it is.
>
> *I* don't want that at all. All I'd like to have is a postgresql.conf
> option specifying additional locations.

Same from me. I think I would even take non-plural location.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-06-10 14:58:41 Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2013-06-10 14:45:10 Re: erroneous restore into pg_catalog schema