| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Transform for pl/perl |
| Date: | 2018-05-18 02:30:05 |
| Message-ID: | fa03cc65-181b-ea48-3a73-430ff9bb0968@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/17/18 17:11, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> This is still listed as an open item, though the patch proposed by Peter
> upthread has been committed. If I understand correctly, ilmari was
> going to propose another patch. Or is the right course of action to set
> the open item as resolved?
The items that are still open from the original email are:
2) jsonb scalar values are passed to the plperl function wrapped in not
one, but _two_ layers of references
3) jsonb numeric values are passed as perl's NV (floating point) type,
losing precision if they're integers that would fit in an IV or UV.
#2 appears to be a quality of implementation issue without any
user-visible effects.
#3 is an opportunity for future improvement, but works as intended right
now.
I think patches for these issues could still be considered during beta,
but they are not release blockers IMO.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-05-18 02:44:44 | Re: Is a modern build system acceptable for older platforms |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-05-18 01:56:55 | Re: Incorrect comment in get_partition_dispatch_recurse |