| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: archive modules |
| Date: | 2022-09-22 11:54:33 |
| Message-ID: | e686a4c1-97f2-02e0-7e58-96bc66489806@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 17.09.22 11:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 14.09.22 23:09, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Here is a patch that addresses this.
>>
>> My intent was to present archive_command as the built-in archive library,
>> but I can see how this might cause confusion, so this change seems
>> reasonable to me.
>
> While working on this, I noticed that in master this conflicts with
> commit 3cabe45a819f8a2a282d9d57e45f259c84e97c3f. I have posted a
> message in that thread looking for a resolution.
I have received clarification there, so I went ahead with this patch
here after some adjustments in master around that other patch.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-09-22 12:02:00 | Re: why can't a table be part of the same publication as its schema |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-09-22 11:52:23 | Re: [PoC] Let libpq reject unexpected authentication requests |