Re: why can't a table be part of the same publication as its schema

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: why can't a table be part of the same publication as its schema
Date: 2022-09-22 12:02:00
Message-ID: 20220922120200.ykep4cloxm2ii3zy@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

FWIW I put this to CI:
https://cirrus-ci.com/build/5823276948652032 (master)

and everything appears to be OK. If anybody has reservations about this
grammar change, please speak up soon, as there's not much time before RC1.

The one for 15 just started running:
https://cirrus-ci.com/build/4735322423558144

--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"El miedo atento y previsor es la madre de la seguridad" (E. Burke)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2022-09-22 12:52:23 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-09-22 11:54:33 Re: archive modules