Re: archive modules

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: archive modules
Date: 2022-09-17 09:49:01
Message-ID: 03e80ca4-81ec-8b58-ac54-40b25f56254f@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14.09.22 23:09, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 09:31:04PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Here is a patch that addresses this.
>
> My intent was to present archive_command as the built-in archive library,
> but I can see how this might cause confusion, so this change seems
> reasonable to me.

While working on this, I noticed that in master this conflicts with
commit 3cabe45a819f8a2a282d9d57e45f259c84e97c3f. I have posted a
message in that thread looking for a resolution.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-09-17 16:10:06 Re: Patch to address creation of PgStat* contexts with null parent context
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-09-17 09:46:39 Re: remove more archiving overhead