Re: Recognizing superuser in pg_hba.conf

From: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Recognizing superuser in pg_hba.conf
Date: 2020-01-06 17:49:45
Message-ID: d955a575-c129-9f90-4486-da78c978579a@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/01/2020 17:03, Tom Lane wrote:
> So it's not clear to me whether we have any meeting of the minds
> on wanting this patch. In the meantime, though, the cfbot
> reports that the patch breaks the ssl tests. Why is that?

I have no idea.  I cannot reproduce the failure locally.

--

Vik Fearing

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-01-06 17:57:33 Re: [PATCH] fix a performance issue with multiple logical-decoding walsenders
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-01-06 17:33:47 Re: Assert failure due to "drop schema pg_temp_3 cascade" for temporary tables and \d+ is not showing any info after drooping temp table schema