Re: Recognizing superuser in pg_hba.conf

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Recognizing superuser in pg_hba.conf
Date: 2020-01-06 16:03:47
Message-ID: 18408.1578326627@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

So it's not clear to me whether we have any meeting of the minds
on wanting this patch. In the meantime, though, the cfbot
reports that the patch breaks the ssl tests. Why is that?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2020-01-06 16:15:38 Re: Allow WHEN in INSTEAD OF triggers
Previous Message Daniel Verite 2020-01-06 16:00:11 Re: Unicode normalization SQL functions