Re: Improve TAP tests of pg_upgrade for cross-version tests

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve TAP tests of pg_upgrade for cross-version tests
Date: 2022-06-12 14:14:35
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2022-06-09 Th 03:49, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:35:57AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 03:03:28PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> (Adding Andrew Dunstan in CC.)
>>> I have been toying with $subject, trying to improve the ways to test
>>> pg_upgrade across different major versions as perl makes that easier.
>>> The buildfarm does three things to allow such tests to work (see
> Rebased to cope with the recent changes in this area.

I tried in fb16d2c658 to avoid littering the mainline code with
version-specific tests, and put that in the methods in the subclasses
that override the mainline functions.

I'll try to rework this along those lines.



Andrew Dunstan

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-06-12 14:19:23 Re: Subscription tests vs log_error_verbosity
Previous Message Jim Popovitch 2022-06-12 14:05:59 connection failures on forked processes