Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: marcelo zen <mzen(at)itapua(dot)com(dot)uy>, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Date: 2020-02-12 19:58:24
Message-ID: d265fd2a1c4d97b487cf1e46199848e56be7227c.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 12:32 -0500, Christopher Browne wrote:
> All said, I think there's some merit to avoiding a PostgreSQL 13 release, because
> there's enough superstition out there about the infamous "number 13."

It would make me sad if the project kotowed to superstition like Oracle did.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Isaac Morland 2020-02-12 20:02:53 Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2020-02-12 19:55:06 Re: Collation versioning