Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: marcelo zen <mzen(at)itapua(dot)com(dot)uy>, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Date: 2020-02-12 19:58:24
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 12:32 -0500, Christopher Browne wrote:
> All said, I think there's some merit to avoiding a PostgreSQL 13 release, because
> there's enough superstition out there about the infamous "number 13."

It would make me sad if the project kotowed to superstition like Oracle did.

Laurenz Albe

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Isaac Morland 2020-02-12 20:02:53 Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2020-02-12 19:55:06 Re: Collation versioning