| From: | Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, marcelo zen <mzen(at)itapua(dot)com(dot)uy>, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20? |
| Date: | 2020-02-12 20:02:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsGm5fqa=a+vui7kqC-ZOJdrDVy=jBQteqEGmTY9bdVJSnRWg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 14:58, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 12:32 -0500, Christopher Browne wrote:
> > All said, I think there's some merit to avoiding a PostgreSQL 13
> release, because
> > there's enough superstition out there about the infamous "number 13."
>
> It would make me sad if the project kotowed to superstition like Oracle
> did.
>
Agreed. That being said, everybody knows you can't avoid the curse of 13 by
re-numbering it - you simply have to avoid the version/floor/day/whatever
after 12.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2020-02-12 20:18:32 | Re: Collation versioning |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2020-02-12 19:58:24 | Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20? |