Re: Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option
Date: 2019-03-25 08:55:57
Message-ID: cd96a537-a302-48ef-b41b-2e247e156745@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/4/19 2:37 PM, Surafel Temesgen wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 8:29 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz
> <mailto:michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>> wrote:
>
>
> This patch needs a rebase because of conflicts done recently for
> pluggable storage, so moved to next CF, waiting on author.
> --
>
>
> Thank you . rebased against current master

This patch no longer passes testing so marked Waiting on Author.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2019-03-25 09:04:05 Re: libpq compression
Previous Message David Steele 2019-03-25 08:53:26 Re: Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option