Re: Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk
Subject: Re: Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option
Date: 2019-03-25 08:53:26
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Surafel,

On 3/1/19 8:18 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I'm not sure hat E-Rows and A-Rows are? I suppose that's estimated and
> actual - but as I explained above, that's not what I propose the
> incremental approach to use.

Marked as Waiting for Author since it appears Tomas is waiting for a
response from you.


In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2019-03-25 08:55:57 Re: Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option
Previous Message David Steele 2019-03-25 08:50:13 Re: Re: Conflict handling for COPY FROM