| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |
| Date: | 2026-03-14 15:25:08 |
| Message-ID: | b3f6ecfb-8772-4e15-a772-8e64fb573d49@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-odbc |
On 3/14/26 12:09 AM, Igor Korot wrote:
> Hi, ALL,
> Have one weird question ;-)
>
> When I connect with ODBC and call SQLPrimaryKey() the function returns
Are you actually using the SQLPrimaryKeys(), not SQLPrimaryKey()?
> all fields including
> "included" fields.
Define 'included' fields.
> I'm getting only direct PK fields.
Define direct PK fields.
>
> I presume that libpq is correct and the ODBC driver is the one that
> needs to be fixed.
Returning the actual results from each case would help.
Have you cranked up the logging on the Postgres server to see what query
ODBC is using?
>
> Just wanted to ask this list before going to complain to the ODBC list... ;-)
>
> Thank you.
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2026-03-14 15:51:24 | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2026-03-14 15:14:56 | Re: compatibility between PostgreSQL JDBC driver version 42.7.10 and Java 25 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2026-03-14 15:51:24 | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2026-03-14 15:07:37 | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |