| From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |
| Date: | 2026-03-14 15:51:24 |
| Message-ID: | CAKFQuwYswndGOm6vnsoNSTWHEC5d29bvYokymtDEY_cyW54FEQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-odbc |
On Saturday, March 14, 2026, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 3/14/26 12:09 AM, Igor Korot wrote:
>
>> Hi, ALL,
>> Have one weird question ;-)
>>
>> When I connect with ODBC and call SQLPrimaryKey() the function returns
>>
>
> Are you actually using the SQLPrimaryKeys(), not SQLPrimaryKey()?
>
> all fields including
>> "included" fields.
>>
>
> Define 'included' fields.
>
They are referring to the unique index that backs the PK constraint.
David J.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Igor Korot | 2026-03-14 16:56:55 | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2026-03-14 15:25:08 | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Igor Korot | 2026-03-14 16:56:55 | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2026-03-14 15:25:08 | Re: Does included columns part of the PK |