Re: Does included columns part of the PK

From: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Does included columns part of the PK
Date: 2026-03-14 15:07:37
Message-ID: CAKFQuwYMB7fV_-jK0jSHf+e0Y9k8kG3y51ihdj54J8v21kdxjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-odbc

On Saturday, March 14, 2026, Igor Korot <ikorot01(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
> I presume that libpq is correct and the ODBC driver is the one that
> needs to be fixed.
>

Odbc does seem to be in the wrong here, yes.

David J.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2026-03-14 15:14:56 Re: compatibility between PostgreSQL JDBC driver version 42.7.10 and Java 25
Previous Message Arbol One 2026-03-14 09:27:20 compatibility between PostgreSQL JDBC driver version 42.7.10 and Java 25

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2026-03-14 15:25:08 Re: Does included columns part of the PK
Previous Message Igor Korot 2026-03-14 07:12:42 Re: Does included columns part of the PK