Quick Links

Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert

From:	Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <nik(at)postgres(dot)ai>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert
Date:	2026-09-23 15:14:17
Message-ID:	arPsyXqqMo9nC_Mk@nathan
Views:	Whole Thread \| Raw Message \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 19, 2026 at 04:05:30PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> I have pushed 0001 and 0002 now and closed the open items.

There's still an open item for "RI fastpath doesn't call
ExecutorCheckPerms_hook". Can that one be marked as resolved?

--
nathan

In response to

Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert at 2026-09-19 07:05:30 from Amit Langote

Responses

Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert at 2026-09-23 23:53:51 from Amit Langote

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Greg Burd	2026-09-23 15:17:22	Re: [PATCH] unrecognized win32 error 448 (ERROR_UNTRUSTED_MOUNT_POINT) breaks tablespaces on Win11 26200
Previous Message	Nathan Bossart	2026-09-23 15:11:35	Re: Several issues with postgres_fdw stats import