Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <nik(at)postgres(dot)ai>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG19: two RI fast-path issues found while testing the batching revert
Date: 2026-09-23 23:53:51
Message-ID: CA+HiwqG7Jo=1h=4R+PQ79KxrbimMLk5crckXvyxYdsR8xUktAw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Nathan,

On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 12:14 AM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2026 at 04:05:30PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> > I have pushed 0001 and 0002 now and closed the open items.
>
> There's still an open item for "RI fastpath doesn't call
> ExecutorCheckPerms_hook". Can that one be marked as resolved?

Sorry, just noticed I had copy-pasted the wrong link for a new item I
added on Tuesday. The correct link is this:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqE4oLLTJqRA%3DpzahLGcnXVPxgYtNsLvOm_-tW04rOqSXw%40mail.gmail.com

I will push the patch and close this item later today.

--
Thanks, Amit Langote

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-09-23 23:54:16 Re: DSA_ALLOC_NO_OOM vs dsm_create ERROR leaving a half-initialized pgstats hash entry
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-09-23 23:48:19 Re: Adding a range check on the sequence index from the publisher.