Re: scary patch contest

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 08:48:51PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 28 Aug 2026, at 20:31, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > Looping back to Robert's list:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 12:48:25PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> 1. RI fast-path FK checks / batching (2da86c1ef9b, b7b27eb41a5,
> >> 2. REPACK / REPACK CONCURRENTLY (ac58465e061, 28d534e2ae0, Antonin
> >> 3. Online data checksums (f19c0eccae9, Daniel Gustafsson and Magnus
> >> 4. UPDATE/DELETE FOR PORTION OF (8e72d914c52, Paul Jungwirth c/b Peter
> >> 5. SQL/PGQ property graphs (2f094e7ac69, Peter Eisentraut and Ashutosh
> >> 6. postgres_fdw statistics import (28972b6fc3d, Corey Huinker and
> >
> > I see a lot of work happening on Online data checksums and REPACK. Is
> > that a good thing, or a concern since we are a month away from release?
>
> I think that needs to evaluated against what, if anything, gets commmitted into
> 19. The fact that work is happening is in itself good since that will benefit
> the features in 20.

+1.

That said, the more I work on [0], the less I feel comfortable with the feature
being part on 19.

[0]: https://postgr.es/m/apUL3N4IE934qJ08%40bdtpg

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com