| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: scary patch contest |
| Date: | 2026-08-28 18:48:51 |
| Message-ID: | D7448AC8-2559-441D-8A3B-4B3EAEA15DEC@yesql.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 28 Aug 2026, at 20:31, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Looping back to Robert's list:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 12:48:25PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> 1. RI fast-path FK checks / batching (2da86c1ef9b, b7b27eb41a5,
>> 2. REPACK / REPACK CONCURRENTLY (ac58465e061, 28d534e2ae0, Antonin
>> 3. Online data checksums (f19c0eccae9, Daniel Gustafsson and Magnus
>> 4. UPDATE/DELETE FOR PORTION OF (8e72d914c52, Paul Jungwirth c/b Peter
>> 5. SQL/PGQ property graphs (2f094e7ac69, Peter Eisentraut and Ashutosh
>> 6. postgres_fdw statistics import (28972b6fc3d, Corey Huinker and
>
> I see a lot of work happening on Online data checksums and REPACK. Is
> that a good thing, or a concern since we are a month away from release?
I think that needs to evaluated against what, if anything, gets commmitted into
19. The fact that work is happening is in itself good since that will benefit
the features in 20.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2026-08-28 18:50:06 | Re: pg_stat_get_autovacuum_scores ignores the main table's reloptions for TOAST tables |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2026-08-28 18:31:25 | Re: scary patch contest |